Anne Simpson

19 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers

Anne Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Literature and Literary Theory 68
  • Linguistics and Language 22
  • Accounting 48
  • Education 107
  • Library and Information Sciences 5
Replace David Pyvis with:
David Pyvis Australia
Ana Canen Brazil
Ute Lanzendorf Germany
Rahul Choudaha United States
Jocelyne Gacel-Ávila Mexico
Peter Daly France
Grant McBurnie Australia
Anne Stevens United Kingdom
George B. N. Ayittey United States
Helene Perold South Africa
Anne Simpson relative to David Pyvis Australia David Pyvis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
David Pyvis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Simpson. The network helps show where Anne Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Anne Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Anne Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Critical Questions: Whose Questions?.
199635
2 201034
3 199632
4 199926
5
Fair Shares: The Future of Shareholder Power and Responsibility
199924
6 201824
7 200223
8 202116
9
Fair Shares: The Future of Shareholder Power and Responsibility
199912
10 201912
11 20196
12 20215
13 20115
14 19833
15 20092
16 19842
17 19962
18 20201
19 19951
20 19960

About Anne Simpson

Anne Simpson is a scholar working on Education, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literacy, Media, and Education (4 papers), Global Education and Multiculturalism (4 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (3 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (1 paper), Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds (1 paper), Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (1 paper) and Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (68 citations), Linguistics and Language (22 citations), Accounting (48 citations), Education (107 citations) and Library and Information Sciences (5 citations). Anne Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Charkham, Bogum Yoon, Satyajit Bose, Dong Guo, Dong‐Sheng Guo, Sam Leinster, Jerry A. Nick, Michael Strong, Timothy T. Stedman and Marco A. Riojas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, The Reading Teacher, Early Years Journal of International Research and Development, Third World Quarterly and Corporate Governance An International Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact