The Reading Teacher

3.8k papers and 34.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.8k papers published in The Reading Teacher in the last decades have received a total of 34.7k indexed citations. Papers published in The Reading Teacher usually cover Education (2.0k papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.6k papers) and Literature and Literary Theory (819 papers) specifically the topics of Reading and Literacy Development (1.3k papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (550 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (440 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Reading Teacher are S. Jay Samuels, Linda B. Gambrell, Donna Ogle, Timothy V. Rasinski, J. Richard Gentry, Hallie Kay Yopp, P. David Pearson, Taffy E. Raphael, Richard L. Allington and John J. Pikulski.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Reading Teacher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Reading Teacher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Reading Teacher.

Countries where authors publish in The Reading Teacher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Reading Teacher. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Reading Teacher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Reading Teacher more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025