Anne Hamby

1.0k citations
51 papers · 720 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Anne Hamby

47 papers receiving 678 citations

Peers

Anne Hamby
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Marketing 309
  • Literature and Literary Theory 210
  • Communication 88
  • Business and International Management 24
  • Applied Psychology 53
Replace Justine Rapp Farrell with:
Justine Rapp Farrell United States
Hye Jin Yoon United States
Ivonne M. Torres United States
Jaehoon Lee United States
James M. Leonhardt United States
Aysen Bakir United States
David B. Wooten United States
Constantino Stavros Australia
James M. Munch United States
Xigen Li Hong Kong
Anne Hamby relative to Justine Rapp Farrell United States Justine Rapp Farrell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Justine Rapp Farrell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Hamby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Hamby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Hamby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Hamby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Hamby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Hamby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Hamby. The network helps show where Anne Hamby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne Hamby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne Hamby Line = papers co-authored together Anne Hamby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201483
2 201680
3 201651
4 202137
5 201536
6 201633
7 201030
8 201628
9 201628
10 202027
11 201927
12 201625
13 201921
14 201218
15 201717
16 202313
17 201812
18 202211
19 202311
20 201611

About Anne Hamby

Anne Hamby is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Communication and Social Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 720 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (26 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (15 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (8 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (7 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (7 papers), Media Studies and Communication (6 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (5 papers) and Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (309 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (210 citations), Communication (88 citations), Business and International Management (24 citations) and Applied Psychology (53 citations). Anne Hamby has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Brinberg, Kim Daniloski, James Jaccard, Ullrich K. H. Ecker, Cristel Antonia Russell, Mark Mulder, Justine M. Rapp, Todd Weaver, Jennifer Edson Escalas and Justine Rapp Farrell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Consumer Affairs, Journal of Advertising, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Journal of Business Research and Journal of Public Policy & Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact