Anne E. Tomes

25 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Anne E. Tomes
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Museology 54
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 114
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 65
  • Marketing 64
  • Business and International Management 12
Replace John J. Shaw with:
John J. Shaw United States
Stoyan Vassilev Sgourev France
Zhiwei Lin China
Jennifer Yurchisin United States
Charles Drago Galunic France
Scott James Smith United States
Stephen W. Brown United Kingdom
Stefan Schwarzkopf Denmark
Kay Peters Germany
Daniel Robichaud Canada
Anne E. Tomes relative to John J. Shaw United States John J. Shaw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
John J. Shaw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne E. Tomes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne E. Tomes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne E. Tomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne E. Tomes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne E. Tomes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne E. Tomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne E. Tomes. The network helps show where Anne E. Tomes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Anne E. Tomes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne E. Tomes Line = papers co-authored together Anne E. Tomes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995115
2 199850
3 198141
4 200139
5 198335
6 199930
7 200030
8 199322
9 199619
10 199618
11 200317
12 199617
13 199114
14 200012
15 199112
16 199611
17 19908
18 20038
19 20106
20 19893

About Anne E. Tomes

Anne E. Tomes is a scholar working on Museology, Strategy and Management, Computer Science Applications, Marketing and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Design Education and Practice (7 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (3 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers) and Business Strategy and Innovation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (54 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (114 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (65 citations), Marketing (64 citations) and Business and International Management (12 citations). Anne E. Tomes has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter Armstrong, D. A. Dunmur, Mike Press, Caroline J. Oates, Gerard P. Hodgkinson, Murray Clark, Barbara Harrison, Mark Edward Phillips, Tim Stapenhurst and Mike Hayes. Their work appears in journals such as Technovation, Design Studies, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal and Journal of Strategic Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact