Anna Stone

766 citations
38 papers · 431 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

    • Face Recognition and Perception 14
    • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 9
    • Memory Processes and Influences 3
    • Deception detection and forensic psychology 6

Anna Stone

35 papers receiving 409 citations

Peers

Anna Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 164
  • Health Informatics 10
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
  • Social Psychology 63
  • Safety Research 23
Replace Sabine Doebel with:
Sabine Doebel United States
Johann Chevalère France
Michelle Jin Yee Neoh Singapore
Edoardo Alfredo Bracaglia Italy
Victoria Chan Canada
Carlos Gallego Spain
Makiko Naka Japan
Kara Griffin United States
Payal Anand United States
Joseph C. Kush United States
Anna Stone relative to Sabine Doebel United States Sabine Doebel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Sabine Doebel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Stone. The network helps show where Anna Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Stone Line = papers co-authored together Anna Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201346
2 200639
3 202228
4 200925
5 200122
6 201721
7 201421
8 200420
9 200320
10 199019
11 201219
12 200617
13 201416
14 200514
15 202013
16 200513
17 200812
18 201812
19 19917
20 20166

About Anna Stone

Anna Stone is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 431 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (3 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (3 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (164 citations), Health Informatics (10 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations), Social Psychology (63 citations) and Safety Research (23 citations). Anna Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tim Valentine, Hywel Thomas, Sarah Burke, Peter Farndon, Edward J. Johns, Janice M. Marshall, Julie Bedward, Christopher C. French, R. Davis and Lara A. Frumkin. Their work appears in journals such as Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Cognition, Visual Cognition, Consciousness and Cognition and Cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact