Visual Cognition

1.5k papers and 41.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Visual Cognition in the last decades have received a total of 41.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Visual Cognition usually cover Cognitive Neuroscience (1.3k papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (470 papers) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (300 papers) specifically the topics of Visual perception and processing mechanisms (775 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (657 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (511 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Visual Cognition are Ronald A. Rensink, Bernhard Hommel, Daniel J. Simons, Simon Baron‐Cohen, Bruno Rossion, John M. Henderson, Jan Theeuwes, Vicki Bruce, Jon Driver and Werner X. Schneider.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Visual Cognition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Visual Cognition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Visual Cognition.

Countries where authors publish in Visual Cognition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Visual Cognition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Visual Cognition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Visual Cognition more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025