Anna Stenning
Impact in
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
-
- Disability Rights and Representation
- Disability Education and Employment
Papers in
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 6
-
- Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature 3
- Co-authors
- Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist (4 shared papers)Nick Chown (1 shared paper)Kristien Hens (2 shared papers)Amy Pearson (2 shared papers)Monique Botha (1 shared paper)Terry Gifford (2 shared papers)David Hartley (1 shared paper)Alyssa Hillary Zisk (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Green Letters (6 papers)People and Nature (1 paper)Critical Survey (1 paper)Autism (1 paper)Autism in Adulthood (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anna Stenning
13 papers receiving 201 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cognitive Neuroscience 103
- Safety Research 27
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 28
- Occupational Therapy 9
- Clinical Psychology 45
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Stenning
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Stenning's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Stenning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Stenning more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Stenning
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Stenning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Stenning. The network helps show where Anna Stenning may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Anna Stenning, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 84 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 12 | Autism and cognitive embodiment: steps towards a non-ableist walking literature | 2019 | 1 |
| 13 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 0 |
About Anna Stenning
Anna Stenning is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Literature and Literary Theory, Occupational Therapy, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Neurology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (6 papers), Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Child Therapy and Development (1 paper), Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper), Child Welfare and Adoption (1 paper), Art, Politics, and Modernism (1 paper) and Geographies of human-animal interactions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (103 citations), Safety Research (27 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (28 citations), Occupational Therapy (9 citations) and Clinical Psychology (45 citations). Anna Stenning has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hanna Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, Nick Chown, Kristien Hens, Amy Pearson, Monique Botha, Terry Gifford, David Hartley, Alyssa Hillary Zisk and Samantha Walton. Their work appears in journals such as Green Letters, People and Nature, Critical Survey, Autism and Autism in Adulthood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.