Countries where authors publish in Communication & Sport
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Communication & Sport. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Communication & Sport with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Communication & Sport more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Communication & Sport
This network shows the impact of papers published in Communication & Sport. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Communication & Sport.
About Communication & Sport
The 589 papers published in Communication & Sport in the last decades have received a total of 8.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Communication & Sport usually cover Gender Studies (357 papers), Communication (175 papers), Sociology and Political Science (256 papers), Marketing (22 papers) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (28 papers) specifically the topics of Sports, Gender, and Society (356 papers), Physical Education and Sports Studies (190 papers), Media Studies and Communication (126 papers), Journalism and Media Studies (45 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (32 papers), Sport Psychology and Performance (28 papers), Digital Games and Media (20 papers) and Media and Digital Communication (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Communication & Sport are Michael A. Messner, Cheryl Cooky, Andrew C. Billings, Holly Thorpe, Jimmy Sanderson, Ann L. Pegoraro, Mary Jo Kane, David Rowe, Kenon A. Brown and Min Xiao.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.