This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Green Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Green Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Green Letters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Green Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Green Letters.
About Green Letters
The 366 papers published in Green Letters in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Green Letters usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (176 papers), Geography, Planning and Development (86 papers), Cultural Studies (36 papers), Philosophy (33 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (14 papers) specifically the topics of Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature (136 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (77 papers), Environmental Philosophy and Ethics (26 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (19 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (18 papers), Utopian, Dystopian, and Speculative Fiction (16 papers), Contemporary Literature and Criticism (15 papers) and Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (14 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Green Letters are Stacy Alaimo, David Abram, Dominic Head, Paul C. Evans, Laurence Coupe, Sarah Thomas, Emma Mason, Terry Gifford, John Sitter and Kate Rigby.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.