Anna Måsbäck

47 papers receiving 2k citations

Peers

Anna Måsbäck
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 368
  • Dermatology 303
  • Oncology 812
  • Reproductive Medicine 307
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 128
Replace Klaske A. ten Hoor with:
Klaske A. ten Hoor Netherlands
Fabio Cappuccini United States
Jordi Xercavins Spain
A. Pfleiderer Germany
Albertus A. Verstraeten Netherlands
Angela G. Arnold United States
J. F. Lynch United States
Alexander Marmé Germany
Margaret A. Tucker United States
Christos Christodoulou Greece
Anna Måsbäck relative to Klaske A. ten Hoor Netherlands Klaske A. ten Hoor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×23.3×
Klaske A. ten Hoor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Måsbäck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Måsbäck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Måsbäck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Måsbäck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Måsbäck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Måsbäck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Måsbäck. The network helps show where Anna Måsbäck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Måsbäck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Måsbäck Line = papers co-authored together Anna Måsbäck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000293
2 1994157
3 2000135
4 2012116
5 2000107
6 2013105
7 199690
8
Novel germline p16 mutation in familial malignant melanoma in southern Sweden.
199683
9 201283
10 200175
11 200375
12 201068
13 201157
14 201756
15 202051
16 200648
17 201148
18 200737
19 201534
20 201732

About Anna Måsbäck

Anna Måsbäck is a scholar working on Oncology, Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Genetics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (19 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (13 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (10 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (3 papers), Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers (2 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (368 citations), Dermatology (303 citations), Oncology (812 citations), Reproductive Medicine (307 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (128 citations). Anna Måsbäck has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Hakan Lars Olsson, Christian Ingvar, Johan Westerdahl, Åke Borg, Susanne Malander, Óskar Þór Jóhannsson, Mef Christina Nilbert, Paivi M Kannisto, Jan Persson and Christer Borgfeldt. Their work appears in journals such as Melanoma Research, Gynecologic Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinical Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact