Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

252.2k citations
9.1k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

7.3k papers receiving 204.2k citations

Peers

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Comparison fields: 5 of 228
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 74.9k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 95.6k
  • Reproductive Medicine 20.2k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 27.9k
  • Surgery 39.5k
Replace International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics with:
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics United States
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica Sweden
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology United Kingdom
Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey United States
BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology United Kingdom
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Germany
Obstetrics and Gynecology United States
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine United States
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology United States
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine United States
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology relative to International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics United States International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

About Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

The 9.1k papers published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology in the last decades have received a total of 252.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (2.5k papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (3.2k papers), Reproductive Medicine (679 papers), Urology (239 papers) and Surgery (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1.6k papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (1.5k papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (925 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (739 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (676 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (554 papers), Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (510 papers) and Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (425 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology are K. H. Nicolaides, Hans Peter Dietz, B. Thilaganathan, L. Valentin, Ahmet Baschat, E. Gratacós, U. Gembruch, Ranjit Akolekar, Aris T. Papageorghiou and Y. Ville.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact