Anna Kline

2.1k citations
50 papers · 1.6k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Kline

50 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Anna Kline
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Clinical Psychology 599
  • General Health Professions 451
  • Applied Psychology 63
  • Infectious Diseases 202
  • Epidemiology 285
Replace Amee J. Epler with:
Amee J. Epler United States
Inger Burnett‐Zeigler United States
Eve M. Sledjeski United States
Erin M. Fekete United States
Chester W. Schmidt United States
Sarah Shaw United States
Victor Olufolahan Lasebikan Nigeria
Donald A. Bux United States
Viviana E. Horigian United States
Marisa Menchola United States
Anna Kline relative to Amee J. Epler United States Amee J. Epler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Amee J. Epler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Kline

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Kline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Kline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Kline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Kline

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Kline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Kline. The network helps show where Anna Kline may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Kline, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Kline Line = papers co-authored together Anna Kline links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992173
2 2005135
3 2009126
4 199582
5 199466
6 201966
7 201363
8 201159
9 201357
10 201256
11 199649
12 201746
13 201043
14 201242
15 202134
16 201634
17 199328
18 199327
19 201424
20
Integrating tobacco dependence treatment and tobacco-free standards into addiction treatment: New Jersey's experience.
200624

About Anna Kline

Anna Kline is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Social Psychology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (12 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (10 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (9 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (8 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (6 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers) and Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (599 citations), General Health Professions (451 citations), Applied Psychology (63 citations), Infectious Diseases (202 citations) and Epidemiology (285 citations). Anna Kline has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Miklos Losonczy, Donald S. Ciccone, Emily Oken, Emily Kline, Jennifer Strickler, Alejandro Interian, Nina A. Cooperman, Bradley D. Sussner, David Smelson and Douglas Ziedonis. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Suicide Research, Psychological Services, Substance Use & Misuse, Drug and Alcohol Dependence and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact