Psychological Services

1.2k papers and 18.6k indexed citations

About

The 1.2k papers published in Psychological Services in the last decades have received a total of 18.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Psychological Services usually cover Clinical Psychology (709 papers), General Health Professions (435 papers) and Social Psychology (352 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (241 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (231 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (162 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychological Services are Gregory A. Aarons, Jack Tsai, Robert A. Rosenheck, Alan E. Kazdin, Jodie Trafton, Paul H. Lysaker, Amy B. Adler, Jeremy F. Mills, Robert D. Morgan and Jon D. Elhai.

In The Last Decade

Psychological Services

1.1k papers receiving 17.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Psychological Services

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychological Services. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychological Services.

Countries where authors publish in Psychological Services

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychological Services. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychological Services with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Services more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026