Countries where authors publish in Psychological Services
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Psychological Services. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Psychological Services with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Psychological Services more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Psychological Services
This network shows the impact of papers published in Psychological Services. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Psychological Services.
About Psychological Services
The 1.2k papers published in Psychological Services in the last decades have received a total of 20.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Psychological Services usually cover Clinical Psychology (724 papers), Applied Psychology (94 papers), General Health Professions (450 papers), Social Psychology (356 papers) and Health (59 papers) specifically the topics of Mental Health Treatment and Access (243 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (236 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (161 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (131 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (129 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (91 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (88 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (83 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Psychological Services are Gregory A. Aarons, Jack Tsai, Robert A. Rosenheck, Alan E. Kazdin, Paul H. Lysaker, Jeremy F. Mills, Jodie Trafton, Amy B. Adler, Robert D. Morgan and Sandra G. Resnick.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.