Arlene King

25 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers

Arlene King
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 17
  • Applied Psychology 36
  • Clinical Psychology 138
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 19
  • Health 30
Replace Leslie Jordan with:
Leslie Jordan United States
Juan Francisco Godoy Spain
Eric Cerino United States
Emilie I. Franchow United States
Michael B. Friedman United States
Anne E. Mueller United States
Naomi A. Arnold-Nedimala United States
Ashley Senior United States
Benson S. Ku United States
Jennifer L. Edens United States
Arlene King relative to Leslie Jordan United States Leslie Jordan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Leslie Jordan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Arlene King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arlene King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arlene King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arlene King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arlene King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arlene King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arlene King. The network helps show where Arlene King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Arlene King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Arlene King Line = papers co-authored together Arlene King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200963
2 201746
3 202134
4 200434
5 201728
6 200321
7 200620
8 201919
9 201619
10 197915
11 202213
12 201112
13 200811
14 202111
15 201911
16 20219
17 20128
18 20193
19 20113
20
Demystifying the Counseling Process: A Self-Help Handbook for Counselors
20002

About Arlene King

Arlene King is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 26 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (8 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (17 citations), Applied Psychology (36 citations), Clinical Psychology (138 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (19 citations) and Health (30 citations). Arlene King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alejandro Interian, Carol Magai, Nathan S. Consedine, Lauren St. Hill, Miriam Latorre-Millán, Anna Kline, Bárbara Stanley, Megan Chesin, Lauren M. Hill and I Slavov. Their work appears in journals such as Behaviour Research and Therapy, Archives of Suicide Research, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, The International Journal of Aging and Human Development and Mindfulness.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact