David Smelson

146 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

David Smelson
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Applied Psychology 166
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 415
  • General Health Professions 626
  • Clinical Psychology 466
  • Toxicology 55
Replace Tami Frankforter with:
Tami Frankforter United States
Siddharth Sarkar India
Roland Simon Portugal
Dennis C. Daley United States
Sheila M. Alessi United States
Susan K. Mikulich‐Gilbertson United States
Iván D. Montoya United States
John Cacciola United States
S. Kelly Avants United States
Susan C. Sonne United States
David Smelson relative to Tami Frankforter United States Tami Frankforter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Tami Frankforter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Smelson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Smelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Smelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Smelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Smelson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Smelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Smelson. The network helps show where David Smelson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Smelson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Smelson Line = papers co-authored together David Smelson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 155 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005140
2 2005135
3 2009131
4 2003106
5 201695
6 200285
7 201681
8 200972
9 201467
10 200661
11 201256
12 201251
13 202050
14 201448
15 202047
16 201447
17 201547
18 201746
19 201043
20 201542

About David Smelson

David Smelson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 155 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Homelessness and Social Issues (29 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (26 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (24 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (21 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (17 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (11 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (8 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (166 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (415 citations), General Health Professions (626 citations), Clinical Psychology (466 citations) and Toxicology (55 citations). David Smelson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Douglas Ziedonis, Miklos Losonczy, Jill M. Williams, Stephanie Rodrigues, Anna Kline, Leon Sawh, David Kalman, Stephanie Carreiro, Christine Timko and Gregory J. DiGirolamo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Community Mental Health Journal, Psychological Services and Psychiatric Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact