Andrew Winer

841 citations
59 papers · 538 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Andrew Winer

55 papers receiving 530 citations

Peers

Andrew Winer
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Urology 47
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 190
  • Cancer Research 56
  • Surgery 158
  • Internal Medicine 9
Replace David Hrouda with:
David Hrouda United Kingdom
Michael Garcia‐Roig United States
Samuel D. Kaffenberger United States
Umberto Carbonara Italy
Michael McGuire United States
P. Carpentier Netherlands
Ronald L. Yap United States
Bartosz Małkiewicz Poland
A. Houlgatte France
Tomasz Szydełko Poland
Andrew Winer relative to David Hrouda United Kingdom David Hrouda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
David Hrouda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Winer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Winer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Winer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Winer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Winer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Winer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Winer. The network helps show where Andrew Winer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Winer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Winer Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Winer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201761
2 202040
3 200540
4 201536
5 202034
6 201729
7
Contemporary management of penile cancer: greater than 15 year MSKCC experience.
201422
8 200920
9 201518
10 201016
11 201516
12
Secondary pelvic congestion syndrome: description and radiographic diagnosis.
201413
13
Contemporary evaluation and management of renal trauma.
201613
14 202013
15 201512
16 201512
17 201611
18 20239
19 20129
20 20139

About Andrew Winer

Andrew Winer is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Epidemiology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal cell carcinoma treatment (11 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (9 papers), Genital Health and Disease (6 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (3 papers), Renal and related cancers (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (47 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (190 citations), Cancer Research (56 citations), Surgery (158 citations) and Internal Medicine (9 citations). Andrew Winer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Coleman, A. Ari Hakimi, Paul Russo, John P. Sfakianos, Victor E. Reuter, Satish K. Tickoo, Michael Chevinsky, Ojas Shah, Elias S. Hyams and Barak Rosenzweig. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, The Journal of Urology, Blood, Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations and Current Urology Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact