Michael Chevinsky

652 citations
16 papers · 320 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Chevinsky

16 papers receiving 315 citations

Peers

Michael Chevinsky
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Cancer Research 123
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 228
  • Molecular Biology 207
  • Urology 17
  • Surgery 95
Replace Viktoria Stühler with:
Viktoria Stühler Germany
Kara N. Babaian United States
Nayneeta Deshmukh United Kingdom
Feilong Yang China
Colleen Watt United States
Shunfang Yang China
Anishka D'souza United States
David Morris United States
Helen More New Zealand
Anders Dahlin United States
Michael Chevinsky relative to Viktoria Stühler Germany Viktoria Stühler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.2×
Viktoria Stühler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Chevinsky

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Chevinsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Chevinsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Chevinsky more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Chevinsky

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Chevinsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Chevinsky. The network helps show where Michael Chevinsky may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Chevinsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Chevinsky Line = papers co-authored together Michael Chevinsky links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201496
2 201759
3 201535
4 201632
5 201522
6 201619
7 201516
8 201413
9 201611
10 20145
11 20153
12 20203
13 20192
14 20162
15 20221
16 20151

About Michael Chevinsky

Michael Chevinsky is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Surgery, Cancer Research and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 16 papers that have together received 320 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal cell carcinoma treatment (11 papers), Renal and related cancers (6 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (5 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (4 papers), Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (3 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (2 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (2 papers) and Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (123 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (228 citations), Molecular Biology (207 citations), Urology (17 citations) and Surgery (95 citations). Michael Chevinsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. Ari Hakimi, Paul Russo, Roy Mano, Alexander Sankin, Jonathan Coleman, James J. Hsieh, Christopher Jakubowski, Daniel D. Sjoberg, Andrew Winer and Robert J. Motzer. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, The Journal of Urology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Journal of Endourology and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact