Andrew Smith

60 papers receiving 732 citations

Peers

Andrew Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 334
  • Strategy and Management 475
  • Transportation 164
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 180
  • Building and Construction 162
Replace Paolo Beria with:
Paolo Beria Italy
Hun-Koo Ha South Korea
Fumitoshi Mizutani Japan
Paul Hooper United Kingdom
Pedro Cantos Sánchez Spain
Ginés de Rus Spain
Reza Mahmoudi Iran
Álvaro Costa Portugal
Peter S. Morrell United Kingdom
Dimitrios Dimitriou Greece
Andrew Smith relative to Paolo Beria Italy Paolo Beria's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Paolo Beria · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Smith. The network helps show where Andrew Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew Smith Line = papers co-authored together Andrew Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200260
2 200956
3 200342
4 201641
5 201238
6 200837
7 200233
8 201430
9 201926
10 201523
11 200621
12 200920
13 201820
14 202220
15 201019
16 201218
17 200316
18
A Review of HOV Lane Performance and Policy Options in the United States
200816
19 201116
20 201815

About Andrew Smith

Andrew Smith is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Building and Construction, Economics and Econometrics and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 63 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Transport and Economic Policies (42 papers), Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (27 papers), Urban and Freight Transport Logistics (15 papers), Maritime Ports and Logistics (11 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (9 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (8 papers), Railway Engineering and Dynamics (5 papers) and Urban Transport and Accessibility (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (334 citations), Strategy and Management (475 citations), Transportation (164 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (180 citations) and Building and Construction (162 citations). Andrew Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chris Nash, Phill Wheat, Michael Pitt, Rico Merkert, Michael G. Pollitt, Andrew Brown, Valerio Benedetto, Fumitoshi Mizutani, Jan-Eric Nilsson and Didier van de Velde. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of transport economics and policy, Research in Transportation Economics, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part F Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice and Transport Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact