Michael Pitt

3.4k citations
122 papers · 2.5k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Pitt

117 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Michael Pitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
  • Building and Construction 1.1k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 614
  • Social Psychology 847
  • Marketing 260
  • Strategy and Management 432
Replace Joseph H.K. Lai with:
Joseph H.K. Lai Hong Kong
Charles Egbu United Kingdom
Qian Shi China
Wellington Didibhuku Thwala South Africa
Zhikun Ding China
Craig Langston Australia
Ruidong Chang Australia
Ernest Effah Ameyaw Hong Kong
Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem Pakistan
Serdar Durdyev New Zealand
Michael Pitt relative to Joseph H.K. Lai Hong Kong Joseph H.K. Lai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.5×
Joseph H.K. Lai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pitt. The network helps show where Michael Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Pitt Line = papers co-authored together Michael Pitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 122 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009233
2 2020141
3 2007123
4 2010110
5 2008105
6 200982
7 201274
8 201168
9 201068
10 200959
11 201155
12 200453
13 201150
14 201448
15 201147
16 200945
17 201144
18 200343
19 202141
20 200741

About Michael Pitt

Michael Pitt is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Social Psychology, Management Science and Operations Research, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Strategy and Management, having authored 122 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Facilities and Workplace Management (48 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (27 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (25 papers), Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (15 papers), Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (12 papers), Housing Market and Economics (11 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers) and Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Building and Construction (1.1k citations), Management Science and Operations Research (614 citations), Social Psychology (847 citations), Marketing (260 citations) and Strategy and Management (432 citations). Michael Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and China. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Tucker, Andrew James Smith, Mike Riley, James B. Bennett, Qiuchen Lu, Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, Sonia Goyal, Long Chen, David S. Walker and Nik Elyna Myeda. Their work appears in journals such as Facilities, Journal of Facilities Management, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, Journal of Corporate Real Estate and Automation in Construction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact