Michael Pitt

3.4k citations
117 papers · 2.3k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Pitt

110 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Michael Pitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Building and Construction 1.0k
  • Management Science and Operations Research 584
  • Social Psychology 807
  • Strategy and Management 418
  • Marketing 251
Replace Joseph H.K. Lai with:
Joseph H.K. Lai Hong Kong
Charles Egbu United Kingdom
Wellington Didibhuku Thwala South Africa
Qian Shi China
Zhikun Ding China
Kherun Nita Ali Malaysia
Craig Langston Australia
Ayodeji Emmanuel Oke Nigeria
Xianhai Meng United Kingdom
Ernest Effah Ameyaw Hong Kong
Michael Pitt relative to Joseph H.K. Lai Hong Kong Joseph H.K. Lai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Joseph H.K. Lai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pitt. The network helps show where Michael Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Pitt Line = papers co-authored together Michael Pitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 117 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009218
2 2020124
3 2007115
4 200898
5 201096
6 200973
7 201269
8 201167
9 201063
10 200957
11 200452
12 201150
13 201148
14 201144
15 201142
16 201442
17 200342
18 200941
19 200739
20 202138

About Michael Pitt

Michael Pitt is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Building and Construction, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 117 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Facilities and Workplace Management (48 papers), Construction Project Management and Performance (27 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (25 papers), Sustainable Building Design and Assessment (15 papers), Aviation Industry Analysis and Trends (12 papers), Housing Market and Economics (11 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (6 papers) and Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Building and Construction (1.0k citations), Management Science and Operations Research (584 citations), Social Psychology (807 citations), Strategy and Management (418 citations) and Marketing (251 citations). Michael Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and China. Frequent co-authors include Matthew Tucker, Andrew Smith, Mike Riley, James Bennett, Qiuchen Lu, Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, Sonia Goyal, Long Chen, Andrew Smith and Nik Elyna Myeda. Their work appears in journals such as Facilities, Journal of Facilities Management, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Journal of Property Investment and Finance and Automation in Construction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact