George Smith

23 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers

George Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Ophthalmology 262
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 344
  • Epidemiology 466
  • Biophysics 29
  • Equine 7
Replace Henryk T. Kasprzak with:
Henryk T. Kasprzak Poland
Sanjeev Kasthurirangan United States
Henk A Weeber Netherlands
Stefan Goelz Germany
Glyn Walsh United Kingdom
Fernando Vargas-Martı́n Spain
Arthur Ho Australia
M. Dubbelman Netherlands
Klaus Ehrmann Australia
J. Bescós Spain
George Smith relative to Henryk T. Kasprzak Poland Henryk T. Kasprzak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Henryk T. Kasprzak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Smith. The network helps show where George Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside George Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Smith Line = papers co-authored together George Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005167
2 2001112
3 199780
4 200874
5
The optical modelling of the human lens.
199174
6 200447
7 198846
8 199745
9 198834
10 200529
11 200126
12 199623
13 199822
14 199219
15 19998
16 19657
17 19947
18 20027
19 19944
20 19982

About George Smith

George Smith is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 26 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (11 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (8 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (5 papers), Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (3 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (3 papers), Advanced optical system design (3 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (2 papers) and Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (262 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (344 citations), Epidemiology (466 citations), Biophysics (29 citations) and Equine (7 citations). George Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David A. Atchison, Leon F. Garner, Barbara Pierścionek, Michael J. Cox, Richard Calver, Derek Y. C. Chan, Jonathan Ennis‐King, Andrew Metha, Phillip Bedggood and Robert C. Augusteyn. Their work appears in journals such as Optometry and Vision Science, Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Vision Research and Nuclear Science and Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact