Andrew G. Ebert

14 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers

Andrew G. Ebert
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • General Decision Sciences 38
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 12
  • Family Practice 6
  • History and Philosophy of Science 17
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 45
Replace Franklin E. Roth with:
Franklin E. Roth United States
Srinivasan Avathvadi Venkatesan India
Jinxia Zhu China
Thomas P. Blaszkowski United States
Karen Mackenzie United States
Alan A. Rubin United States
Mandy Kromp Germany
Angela Pinto United States
Maisha Kelly Freeman United States
Ann M. Lawrence United States
Andrew G. Ebert relative to Franklin E. Roth United States Franklin E. Roth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×19×
Franklin E. Roth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew G. Ebert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew G. Ebert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew G. Ebert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew G. Ebert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew G. Ebert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew G. Ebert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew G. Ebert. The network helps show where Andrew G. Ebert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Andrew G. Ebert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Andrew G. Ebert Line = papers co-authored together Andrew G. Ebert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 1998118
2 196457
3 200246
4 196531
5 196630
6 202118
7 201713
8 197910
9 19799
10 20098
11 19616
12 19711
13 20111
14
Phosphorus: The Forgotten, Essential Ingredient
20051

About Andrew G. Ebert

Andrew G. Ebert is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 14 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1 paper) and Phenothiazines and Benzothiazines Synthesis and Activities (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (38 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (12 citations), Family Practice (6 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (17 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (45 citations). Andrew G. Ebert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gerd Gigerenzer, Ulrich Hoffrage, Sidney M. Hess, George K. W. Yim, T.S. Miya, Charles R. Schleifer, Jonathan R. Seckl, Yuri V. Kotelevtsev, Bernd Alois Zimmermann and JJ Mullins. Their work appears in journals such as Toxicology Letters, Obesity, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, AIDS Care and Journal of Food Protection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact