Ande Nesmith

724 citations
15 papers · 424 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ande Nesmith

14 papers receiving 389 citations

Peers

Ande Nesmith
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Safety Research 143
  • Clinical Psychology 242
  • Public Administration 35
  • General Health Professions 184
  • Sociology and Political Science 219
Replace Jennifer Propp with:
Jennifer Propp United States
Kathy Lemon Osterling United States
Robin Sen United Kingdom
Gary Clapton United Kingdom
Yvonne Sjöblom Sweden
Veronika Paulsen Norway
James P. Gleeson United States
N Hazel United Kingdom
Jacquelyn McCroskey United States
Barbara A. Pine United States
Ande Nesmith relative to Jennifer Propp United States Jennifer Propp's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Jennifer Propp · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ande Nesmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ande Nesmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ande Nesmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ande Nesmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ande Nesmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ande Nesmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ande Nesmith. The network helps show where Ande Nesmith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ande Nesmith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ande Nesmith Line = papers co-authored together Ande Nesmith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2008173
2 201351
3 201545
4 201227
5 201527
6 202022
7 201121
8 201421
9 201918
10 20206
11
Creating Community Responsibility for Child Protection: Findings and Implications from the Evaluation of the Community Partnerships for Protecting Children Initiative
20056
12 20174
13 20202
14 20231
15 20220

About Ande Nesmith

Ande Nesmith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Safety Research, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 15 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Welfare and Adoption (8 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (2 papers), Family Support in Illness (2 papers), Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (2 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (143 citations), Clinical Psychology (242 citations), Public Administration (35 citations), General Health Professions (184 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (219 citations). Ande Nesmith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Ebony Ruhland, Shanondora Billiot, Cathryne L. Schmitz, Meredith Powers, Deborah Daro, Stephen R. Baker, John White, Eliza Hartley and Susanna R. Curry. Their work appears in journals such as Children and Youth Services Review, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, Journal of Public Child Welfare, Child & Family Social Work and Social Work Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact