Gary Clapton

664 citations
57 papers · 409 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Gary Clapton

54 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Gary Clapton
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Public Administration 120
  • Safety Research 134
  • General Health Professions 149
  • Clinical Psychology 128
  • Reproductive Medicine 50
Replace Christine Cocker with:
Christine Cocker United Kingdom
Moshoula Capous‐Desyllas United States
Edward Kruk Canada
Nathanael J. Okpych United States
Amy Butler United States
Clive Sellick United Kingdom
David Shemmings United Kingdom
Deena Mandell Canada
Reiko Boyd United States
Andrew Zinn United States
Gary Clapton relative to Christine Cocker United Kingdom Christine Cocker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Christine Cocker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gary Clapton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gary Clapton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gary Clapton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gary Clapton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gary Clapton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gary Clapton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gary Clapton. The network helps show where Gary Clapton may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Gary Clapton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gary Clapton Line = papers co-authored together Gary Clapton links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Birth fathers and their adoption experiences
200232
2 200931
3 200630
4 201229
5 200821
6 201319
7 201219
8 199714
9 200114
10 200714
11
The satanic abuse controversy : social workers and the social work press
199312
12 201411
13 201811
14 200711
15 201610
16 20168
17 20187
18 20197
19
Social Work with Fathers: Positive Practice
20137
20 20087

About Gary Clapton

Gary Clapton is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Safety Research and Clinical Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Work Education and Practice (18 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (16 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (11 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (7 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (120 citations), Safety Research (134 citations), General Health Professions (149 citations), Clinical Psychology (128 citations) and Reproductive Medicine (50 citations). Gary Clapton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Viviene E. Cree, Mark Smith, John Clifton, Lesley Williams Reid, R. S. Perry, Fiona Morrison, S. Levy, J Simpson and Richard Ingram. Their work appears in journals such as Adoption & Fostering, Social Work Education, The British Journal of Social Work, BJGP Open and Forum qualitative Sozialforschung.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact