Applied Nursing Research

2.0k papers and 37.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.0k papers published in Applied Nursing Research in the last decades have received a total of 37.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Applied Nursing Research usually cover General Health Professions (751 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (357 papers) and Clinical Psychology (284 papers) specifically the topics of Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (125 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (121 papers) and Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (120 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Applied Nursing Research are Linda Lindsey Davis, Ann Hendrich, Elizabeth Halcomb, Allen W. Nyhuis, Patricia M. Davidson, Mary T. Champagne, Sandra G. Funk, Elizabeth M. Tornquist, Tom Defloor and Keela Herr.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Applied Nursing Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Applied Nursing Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Applied Nursing Research.

Countries where authors publish in Applied Nursing Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Applied Nursing Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Applied Nursing Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Applied Nursing Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025