Medical Law Review

708 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 708 papers published in Medical Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Medical Law Review usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (207 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (185 papers) and General Health Professions (153 papers) specifically the topics of Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Medical Decision-Making (198 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (140 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (97 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Medical Law Review are José Miola, Roger Magnusson, Muireann Quigley, Mary Donnelly, Margaret Brazier, Roy Gilbar, Elizabeth Chloe Romanis, John Coggon, Suzanne Ost and Sally Sheldon.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Medical Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Medical Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Medical Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Medical Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Medical Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Medical Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Medical Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025