Amy E. Barth

2.6k citations
50 papers · 2.0k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Amy E. Barth

49 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Amy E. Barth
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.5k
  • Statistics and Probability 609
  • Education 677
  • Safety Research 152
  • Clinical Psychology 351
Replace Eunsoo Cho with:
Eunsoo Cho United States
Susan E. Stothard United Kingdom
Stefan Samuelsson Sweden
Maggie Snowling United Kingdom
Solveig‐Alma Halaas Lyster Norway
Tiffany P. Hogan United States
Mack D. Burke United States
Hannah Nash United Kingdom
Rebecca S. Betjemann United States
Suzanne M. Adlof United States
Amy E. Barth relative to Eunsoo Cho United States Eunsoo Cho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Eunsoo Cho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amy E. Barth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amy E. Barth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy E. Barth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy E. Barth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amy E. Barth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy E. Barth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy E. Barth. The network helps show where Amy E. Barth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amy E. Barth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amy E. Barth Line = papers co-authored together Amy E. Barth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010168
2 2012107
3 2011104
4 201198
5 200882
6 200181
7 200976
8 201475
9 200974
10 201171
11 201570
12
Cognitive Correlates of Inadequate Response to Reading Intervention.
201170
13 201368
14 200865
15 201058
16 200854
17 201451
18 201146
19 201042
20 200439

About Amy E. Barth

Amy E. Barth is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability, Clinical Psychology, Education and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 50 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reading and Literacy Development (37 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (20 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (10 papers), Language Development and Disorders (5 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (4 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (4 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.5k citations), Statistics and Probability (609 citations), Education (677 citations), Safety Research (152 citations) and Clinical Psychology (351 citations). Amy E. Barth has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Jack Μ. Fletcher, Sharon Vaughn, David J. Francis, Carolyn A. Denton, Paul T. Cirino, Karla K. Stuebing, Jade Wexler, Melissa Romain, Tammy D. Tolar and Jason L. Anthony. Their work appears in journals such as Learning and Individual Differences, Reading and Writing, School Psychology Review, Journal of Educational Psychology and Scientific Studies of Reading.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact