Amit Marmelshtein

449 citations
7 papers · 234 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Amit Marmelshtein

6 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers

Amit Marmelshtein
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 189
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 77
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 30
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 46
  • Developmental Neuroscience 9
Replace Aaron J. Krom with:
Aaron J. Krom Israel
David Hoehn Germany
Matteo Marcatili Italy
Zoltan A. Torontali Canada
Faguo Yue China
Nathalia Zak Norway
Jaclyn Durkin United States
Jonathan Dubé Canada
Mohsen Afrasiabi United States
Luca Matarazzo Belgium
Amit Marmelshtein relative to Aaron J. Krom Israel Aaron J. Krom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Aaron J. Krom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amit Marmelshtein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amit Marmelshtein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amit Marmelshtein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amit Marmelshtein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amit Marmelshtein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amit Marmelshtein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amit Marmelshtein. The network helps show where Amit Marmelshtein may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Amit Marmelshtein, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amit Marmelshtein Line = papers co-authored together Amit Marmelshtein links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2017130
2 202035
3 202033
4 202228
5 20214
6 20234
7 20250

About Amit Marmelshtein

Amit Marmelshtein is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems and Infectious Diseases, having authored 7 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (1 paper), Sleep and related disorders (1 paper), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (1 paper) and Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (189 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (77 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (30 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (46 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (9 citations). Amit Marmelshtein has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Yuval Nir, Itzhak Fried, Thomas Andrillon, Giulio Tononi, Chiara Cirelli, Nanthia Suthana, Ariel Tankus, Aaron J. Krom, Firas Fahoum and Hanna Hayat. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, Cerebral Cortex, Nature Medicine, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact