Anabel Eckerling

7 papers receiving 270 citations

Anabel Eckerling's Hit Papers

Stress and cancer: mechanisms, significance and future directions 2021 · 206 citations
2060+1+3Years since publication50100150200

Peers

Anabel Eckerling
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 26
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 86
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Human-Computer Interaction 19
  • Oncology 71
Replace Hyeonjin Jeon with:
Hyeonjin Jeon South Korea
Achim Nolte Germany
Alice Riva Italy
Alexandra M. Amen United States
Elżbieta Szmida Poland
Caroline Masse France
Fangfang Tian China
Francesca Agostini Italy
Anabel Eckerling relative to Hyeonjin Jeon South Korea Hyeonjin Jeon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11×
Hyeonjin Jeon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anabel Eckerling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anabel Eckerling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anabel Eckerling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anabel Eckerling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anabel Eckerling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anabel Eckerling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anabel Eckerling. The network helps show where Anabel Eckerling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Anabel Eckerling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anabel Eckerling Line = papers co-authored together Anabel Eckerling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1
Stress and cancer: mechanisms, significance and future directions
Hit paper breakdown →
2021206
2 202031
3 202013
4 202312
5 20239
6 20235
7 20201
8 20240

About Anabel Eckerling

Anabel Eckerling is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Oncology, Biotechnology, Social Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 277 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (4 papers), Cancer Research and Treatments (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper), Diet and metabolism studies (1 paper), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (1 paper), Chemokine receptors and signaling (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (26 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (86 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (19 citations) and Oncology (71 citations). Anabel Eckerling has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Shamgar Ben‐Eliyahu, Liat Sorski, Elad Sandbank, Itay Ricon‐Becker, Naama Friedmann, Gal Raz, Orly Fuhrman, Ricardo Tarrasch, Erica K. Sloan and Rita Haldar. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Biology, Nature reviews. Cancer, Current Biology, International Journal of Surgery and Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact