Amanda M. Mitchell

37 papers receiving 566 citations

Peers

Amanda M. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Biological Psychiatry 24
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 38
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 171
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 39
  • Health 34
Replace Gwen Latendresse with:
Gwen Latendresse United States
Jennifer E. McCabe United States
Margaret G. Spinelli United States
Kristina M. Colbenson United States
Laurel Q. P. Paterson Canada
Sierra B. Cronan United States
Brian Stafford United States
Bharathi J. Zvara United States
Elaine Rassaby United Kingdom
Michael Kozloski United States
Amanda M. Mitchell relative to Gwen Latendresse United States Gwen Latendresse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.7×
Gwen Latendresse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Mitchell. The network helps show where Amanda M. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda M. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda M. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Amanda M. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201667
2 201656
3 201848
4 201747
5 201838
6 201730
7 201828
8 201124
9 201524
10 201623
11 201923
12 201019
13 201618
14 201417
15 201613
16 201713
17 201712
18 202112
19 201310
20 20139

About Amanda M. Mitchell

Amanda M. Mitchell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Biological Psychiatry, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy and Applied Psychology, having authored 39 papers that have together received 592 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Nursing care and research (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (24 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (38 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (171 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (39 citations) and Health (34 citations). Amanda M. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Lisa M. Christian, Marilly S. Palettas, Jennifer M. Kowalsky, Patrick Pössel, Shannon L. Gillespie, Kyle M. Porter, Donna H. Henderson-King, Elissa S. Epel, Jue Lin and Matthew S. Berry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Psychology, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Psychotherapy and Journal of Family Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact