Amanda M. Mitchell

35 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers

Amanda M. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 57
  • Biological Psychiatry 27
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 55
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 139
  • Clinical Psychology 100
Replace Alexander Neumann with:
Alexander Neumann Netherlands
Yudan Ding China
Qiu‐Yue Zhong United States
Camila Saggioro de Figueiredo Brazil
Daniel M. Campagne Spain
Souci Frissa United Kingdom
Ícaro Raony Brazil
Alex S. F. Kwong United Kingdom
Amanda Hudson Canada
Hyoung Yoon Chang South Korea
Amanda M. Mitchell relative to Alexander Neumann Netherlands Alexander Neumann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Alexander Neumann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Mitchell. The network helps show where Amanda M. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda M. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda M. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Amanda M. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201662
2 201652
3 201847
4 201745
5 201837
6 201729
7 201827
8 201124
9 201622
10 201522
11 201921
12 201018
13 201617
14 201416
15 201713
16 201612
17 201712
18 202111
19 201310
20 20139

About Amanda M. Mitchell

Amanda M. Mitchell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 39 papers that have together received 563 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (6 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (6 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (3 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (2 papers) and Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (57 citations), Biological Psychiatry (27 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (55 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (139 citations) and Clinical Psychology (100 citations). Amanda M. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lisa M. Christian, Marilly Palettas, Jennifer M. Kowalsky, Patrick Pössel, Shannon L. Gillespie, Kyle Porter, Elissa S. Epel, Jue Lin, Donna Henderson‐King and Matthew Berry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Health Psychology, Psychoneuroendocrinology, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Journal of Diversity in Higher Education and Urban Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact