Amanda Gentry

28 papers receiving 734 citations

Peers

Amanda Gentry
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Family Practice 34
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 172
  • Health 37
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 63
  • Applied Psychology 20
Replace Marianna Masiero with:
Marianna Masiero Italy
Jean‐Louis Slachmuylder Belgium
Nick Hulbert-Williams United Kingdom
Janet Ellis Canada
Carol L. Alter United States
Tanja Zimmermann Germany
Patricia E. Hershberger United States
Phyllis Butow Australia
Patricia Ward United Kingdom
Julia Menichetti Norway
Amanda Gentry relative to Marianna Masiero Italy Marianna Masiero's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Marianna Masiero · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Gentry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Gentry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Gentry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Gentry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Gentry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Gentry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Gentry. The network helps show where Amanda Gentry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Gentry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Gentry Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Gentry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014104
2 201586
3 201455
4 200949
5 200948
6 201546
7 200746
8 201644
9 200141
10 200627
11 201825
12 201825
13 201522
14 201520
15 201419
16 201117
17 201214
18 202013
19 200511
20
Perceived Research Burden Assessment (PeRBA): Instrument Development and Psychometric Evaluation
201410

About Amanda Gentry

Amanda Gentry is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Oncology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 761 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (9 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (34 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (172 citations), Health (37 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (63 citations) and Applied Psychology (20 citations). Amanda Gentry has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer H. Lingler, Susan M. Sereika, Catherine M. Bender, Thomas A. Arcury, Adam Brufsky, Lauren Terhorst, Joseph G. Grzywacz, Margaret Rosenzweig, Lu Hu and Karen L. Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Psycho-Oncology and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact