Alison E. Parker

40 papers receiving 814 citations

Peers

Alison E. Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Clinical Psychology 377
  • Algebra and Number Theory 59
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 41
  • Geometry and Topology 102
  • Social Psychology 171
Replace David E. Barrett with:
David E. Barrett United States
Richard Driscoll United States
Sarah R. Black United States
Kirsi Peltonen Finland
Kui Wang China
Toshiki Katsura Japan
Beth Wilson Canada
Marion Martin United Kingdom
Marta Valenzuela Chile
Alison E. Parker relative to David E. Barrett United States David E. Barrett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10.3×
David E. Barrett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison E. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison E. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison E. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison E. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison E. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison E. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison E. Parker. The network helps show where Alison E. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison E. Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison E. Parker Line = papers co-authored together Alison E. Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013104
2 200991
3 201491
4 200969
5 201266
6 200861
7 200651
8 201339
9 200525
10 201224
11 201320
12 201019
13 200819
14 200119
15 200617
16 197216
17 200714
18 200913
19 201112
20 201612

About Alison E. Parker

Alison E. Parker is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Clinical Psychology, Algebra and Number Theory and Atmospheric Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 876 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (13 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (9 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (7 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (377 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (59 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (41 citations), Geometry and Topology (102 citations) and Social Psychology (171 citations). Alison E. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Janis B. Kupersmidt, Amy G. Halberstadt, Julie C. Dunsmore, Julie Thompson, Tracy M. Scull, Erin T. Mathis, Kristen Elmore, Julie Hakim‐Larson, Sylvia Voelker and Greg Townley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Journal of Vision and Early Education and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact