Alison E. Parker

38 papers receiving 751 citations

Peers

Alison E. Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Clinical Psychology 349
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 41
  • Algebra and Number Theory 58
  • Geometry and Topology 100
  • Social Psychology 170
Replace David E. Barrett with:
David E. Barrett United States
Sarah R. Black United States
Francesca Pellegrino Italy
Loren R. Mosher United States
Kui Wang China
Tamara Del Vecchio United States
Matthew P. McKay United States
Robert G. Hasson United States
Stephanie T. Nishimura United States
Toshiki Katsura Japan
Alison E. Parker relative to David E. Barrett United States David E. Barrett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
David E. Barrett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alison E. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison E. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison E. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison E. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison E. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison E. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison E. Parker. The network helps show where Alison E. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alison E. Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alison E. Parker Line = papers co-authored together Alison E. Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201397
2 200989
3 201479
4 200969
5 201263
6 200857
7 200650
8 201334
9 201223
10 200522
11 200119
12 201019
13 200819
14 200617
15 197216
16 200714
17 201112
18 200912
19 200710
20 20049

About Alison E. Parker

Alison E. Parker is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Clinical Psychology, Algebra and Number Theory and Atmospheric Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 801 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (13 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (9 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (9 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (7 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (349 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (41 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (58 citations), Geometry and Topology (100 citations) and Social Psychology (170 citations). Alison E. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Janis B. Kupersmidt, Amy G. Halberstadt, Julie C. Dunsmore, Julie Thompson, Tracy M. Scull, Erin T. Mathis, Kristen Elmore, Sylvia Voelker, Julie Hakim‐Larson and Greg Townley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, Journal of Vision and Early Education and Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact