Alexandre De
Impact in
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
-
- Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Papers in
-
- Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques 4
-
- Nutritional Studies and Diet 2
- Co-authors
- Benjamin Allès (10 shared papers)Serge Herçberg (7 shared papers)Emmanuelle Kesse‐Guyot (9 shared papers)Pilar Galán (7 shared papers)Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi (10 shared papers)Cédric Agaësse (11 shared papers)Eloi Chazelas (7 shared papers)Mélanie Deschasaux (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMJ (2 papers)PLoS Medicine (2 papers)Cancer Research (2 papers)European Heart Journal (1 paper)International Journal of Epidemiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Alexandre De
9 papers receiving 489 citations
Alexandre De's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Nutrition and Dietetics 204
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 40
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 151
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 80
- Sensory Systems 12
Countries citing papers authored by Alexandre De
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexandre De's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexandre De with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexandre De more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexandre De
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexandre De. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexandre De. The network helps show where Alexandre De may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alexandre De, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet-Santé population-based cohort study Hit paper breakdown → | 2022 | 203 |
| 2 | 2022 | 123 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 82 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 56 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2026 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2026 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2026 | 0 |
About Alexandre De
Alexandre De is a scholar working on Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 11 papers that have together received 506 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nutrition and Dietetics (204 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (40 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (151 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (80 citations) and Sensory Systems (12 citations). Alexandre De has collaborated with scholars based in France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Allès, Serge Herçberg, Emmanuelle Kesse‐Guyot, Pilar Galán, Fabien Szabo de Edelenyi, Cédric Agaësse, Eloi Chazelas, Mélanie Deschasaux, Chantal Julia and Mathilde Touvier. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, PLoS Medicine, Cancer Research, European Heart Journal and International Journal of Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.