Alex Wright

60 papers receiving 713 citations

Peers

Alex Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 119
  • Geometry and Topology 76
  • Mathematical Physics 69
  • Ophthalmology 47
  • Clinical Biochemistry 30
Replace Xu-Hua Yang with:
Xu-Hua Yang China
Avijit Sarkar United States
Karen Yeung United States
Haiyan Huang China
Mehran Ebrahimi Canada
M D Meyer United States
Sérgio Da Silva Brazil
Mohamed Khalifa Egypt
Mark Edward Lewis United States
Jia Shao United Kingdom
Alex Wright relative to Xu-Hua Yang China Xu-Hua Yang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×
Xu-Hua Yang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alex Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alex Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Wright. The network helps show where Alex Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alex Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alex Wright Line = papers co-authored together Alex Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200579
2 200853
3 201448
4 201446
5 201834
6 201430
7 201129
8 200627
9 201426
10 202226
11 201424
12 201023
13 201721
14 200819
15 200918
16 202317
17 201716
18 201315
19 201315
20 202014

About Alex Wright

Alex Wright is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Ophthalmology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 67 papers that have together received 774 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (15 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (9 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (8 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (8 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (6 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (119 citations), Geometry and Topology (76 citations), Mathematical Physics (69 citations), Ophthalmology (47 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (30 citations). Alex Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Mark W. Dewhirst, David Needham, Sally Dibb, Peet Venter, Snejina Michailova, Ina Ehnert, Jean‐Pascal Gond, Laure Cabantous, Ronen E. Mukamel and Curtis T. McMullen. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery, Annals of Mathematics, Duke Mathematical Journal and Geometric and Functional Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact