Simon Fitzpatrick

42 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers

Simon Fitzpatrick
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Mathematical Physics 240
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 420
  • Geometry and Topology 195
  • Applied Mathematics 201
  • Numerical Analysis 95
Replace Edward Stein with:
Edward Stein United States
Robert Richmond Ellis United States
Judith Victor Grabiner United States
Judith Roitman United States
Marta C. Bunge Canada
Roger Barnard United States
Anup Kumar Roy India
Scott D. Pauls United States
Victor Katz United States
Salomé Martínez Chile
Simon Fitzpatrick relative to Edward Stein United States Edward Stein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Edward Stein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Simon Fitzpatrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Simon Fitzpatrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Simon Fitzpatrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Simon Fitzpatrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Simon Fitzpatrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Simon Fitzpatrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Simon Fitzpatrick. The network helps show where Simon Fitzpatrick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Simon Fitzpatrick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Simon Fitzpatrick Line = papers co-authored together Simon Fitzpatrick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016181
2
Representing monotone operators by convex functions
1988113
3 198074
4 200866
5 198263
6 198758
7 198933
8 202031
9 199229
10 199125
11 198923
12 201719
13 202017
14 199516
15 200915
16 201413
17 202412
18 198712
19 201311
20 201911

About Simon Fitzpatrick

Simon Fitzpatrick is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Probability and Geometry and Topology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 943 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optimization and Variational Analysis (19 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (8 papers), Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (6 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (240 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (420 citations), Geometry and Topology (195 citations), Applied Mathematics (201 citations) and Numerical Analysis (95 citations). Simon Fitzpatrick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Michael Borwein, R. R. Phelps, J Giles, Anne C. Pisor, Alexander Bolyanatz, Daniel M. T. Fessler, Stephen Stich, Brooke A. Scelza, H. Clark Barrett and Christopher R. Von Rueden. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Biology & Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Philosophical Papers.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact