A. Bowling

3.4k citations
47 papers · 2.6k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

A. Bowling

46 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

A. Bowling
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 213
  • Health 464
  • General Health Professions 637
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 85
  • Family Practice 22
Replace James N. Laditka with:
James N. Laditka United States
Ichiro Kai Japan
Morag Farquhar United Kingdom
Soong‐Nang Jang South Korea
Laetitia Teixeira Portugal
Stéphane Cullati Switzerland
Gopalakrishnan Netuveli United Kingdom
Nancy Hoeymans Netherlands
H.‐H. König Germany
Larry M. Manheim United States
A. Bowling relative to James N. Laditka United States James N. Laditka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.1×
James N. Laditka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Bowling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Bowling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Bowling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Bowling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Bowling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Bowling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Bowling. The network helps show where A. Bowling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Bowling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Bowling Line = papers co-authored together A. Bowling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002257
2 1999242
3 2012226
4 1999164
5 1991152
6 1989132
7 2001116
8 2001113
9 200198
10 200788
11 200186
12 199963
13 200658
14 200758
15 200357
16 200956
17 199655
18 199850
19 199750
20 199847

About A. Bowling

A. Bowling is a scholar working on Health, General Health Professions, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Social Psychology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (9 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (213 citations), Health (464 citations), General Health Professions (637 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (85 citations) and Family Practice (22 citations). A. Bowling has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Shah Ebrahim, Joy Windsor, Peter Browne, Emily Grundy, M Bond, Donna L. Lamping, Crispin Jenkinson, David Banister, Stephen Sutton and Olga Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Age and Ageing, Aging & Mental Health, Heart and BMJ Quality & Safety.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact