Countries where authors publish in Western Folklore
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Western Folklore. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Western Folklore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Western Folklore more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Western Folklore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Western Folklore.
About Western Folklore
The 1.9k papers published in Western Folklore in the last decades have received a total of 16.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Western Folklore usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (525 papers), Music (129 papers), Anthropology (227 papers), Cultural Studies (133 papers) and History (156 papers) specifically the topics of Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (435 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (113 papers), Music History and Culture (101 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (65 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (57 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (54 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (52 papers) and Philippine History and Culture (49 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Western Folklore are Victor Turner, Elliott Oring, Malcolm Collier, John Collier, Alan Dundes, Richard Bauman, Jan Harold Brunvand, Leonard Norman Primiano, Simon J. Bronner and Regina Bendix.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.