Elliott Oring

2.2k citations
67 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Elliott Oring

58 papers receiving 812 citations

Peers

Elliott Oring
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Literature and Literary Theory 402
  • Social Psychology 585
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 259
  • Music 65
  • Gender Studies 155
Replace Ansgar Nünning with:
Ansgar Nünning Germany
Peter Opie United Kingdom
Sidonie Smith United States
George Whalley Canada
Tamar Katriel Israel
Julia Watson United States
Susan Rubín Suleiman United States
Joseph Falaky Nagy United States
Ronald J. Pelias United States
Barry Brummett United States
Elliott Oring relative to Ansgar Nünning Germany Ansgar Nünning's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.1×
Ansgar Nünning · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elliott Oring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elliott Oring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliott Oring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliott Oring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elliott Oring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliott Oring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliott Oring. The network helps show where Elliott Oring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Elliott Oring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elliott Oring Line = papers co-authored together Elliott Oring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986259
2 200088
3 198281
4 200862
5 200950
6 198749
7 200042
8 198742
9 201632
10 201128
11 199126
12 198925
13 199525
14 200824
15 198623
16
Risky Business Political Jokes under Repressive Regimes
201621
17 199421
18 198719
19 200818
20 197615

About Elliott Oring

Elliott Oring is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Communication, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (26 papers), Humor Studies and Applications (16 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (3 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (2 papers) and Communication in Education and Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (402 citations), Social Psychology (585 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (259 citations), Music (65 citations) and Gender Studies (155 citations). Elliott Oring has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mahadev L. Apte, Ted Cohen, Jan Harold Brunvand, Charles R. Gruner, Alan Dundes, Paul G. Lewis, Giselinde Kuipers, Rod A. Martin, Victor Raskin and Munro S. Edmonson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American Folklore, Western Folklore, Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, Journal of Folklore Research and Ethos.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact