Elliott Oring

2.1k citations
62 papers · 1.0k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Elliott Oring

53 papers receiving 701 citations

Peers

Elliott Oring
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Literature and Literary Theory 354
  • Social Psychology 504
  • Music 61
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 220
  • Gender Studies 138
Replace Shoshana Felman with:
Shoshana Felman United States
George Whalley Canada
Virginia Woolf India
Hans H. Rudnick
Julia Watson United States
Ronald J. Pelias United States
Geneva Smitherman United States
Derek Attridge United Kingdom
Kaja Silverman
Joseph Falaky Nagy United States
Elliott Oring relative to Shoshana Felman United States Shoshana Felman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Shoshana Felman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Elliott Oring

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elliott Oring's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elliott Oring with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elliott Oring more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elliott Oring

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elliott Oring. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elliott Oring. The network helps show where Elliott Oring may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Elliott Oring, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Elliott Oring Line = papers co-authored together Elliott Oring links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986230
2 200077
3 198274
4 200853
5 198746
6 200941
7 200038
8 198736
9 201626
10 199126
11 200825
12 201124
13 199522
14 198922
15 198620
16 199420
17
Risky Business Political Jokes under Repressive Regimes
201619
18 198718
19 197615
20
Folk Groups And Folklore Genres
198914

About Elliott Oring

Elliott Oring is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Music, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (24 papers), Humor Studies and Applications (15 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (4 papers), Comics and Graphic Narratives (4 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (3 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (2 papers) and Media, Communication, and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (354 citations), Social Psychology (504 citations), Music (61 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (220 citations) and Gender Studies (138 citations). Elliott Oring has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mahadev L. Apte, Ted Cohen, Charles R. Gruner, Jan Harold Brunvand, Alan Dundes, Rod A. Martin, Paul G. Lewis, Giselinde Kuipers, Victor Raskin and Munro S. Edmonson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American Folklore, Western Folklore, Humor - International Journal of Humor Research, Journal of Folklore Research and European Journal of Humour Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact