Anthropological Quarterly

1.9k papers and 33.2k indexed citations

About

The 1.9k papers published in Anthropological Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 33.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Anthropological Quarterly usually cover Sociology and Political Science (723 papers), Anthropology (395 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (291 papers) specifically the topics of Anthropological Studies and Insights (212 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (80 papers) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (66 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anthropological Quarterly are Dell Hymes, Lynn Meskell, Deborah Reed‐Danahay, Eduardo P. Archetti, Christian Ghasarian, Pierre Bourdıeu, Richard Nice, Michael Agar, Mary Douglas and Aaron Wíldavsky.

In The Last Decade

Anthropological Quarterly

1.4k papers receiving 18.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Anthropological Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Anthropological Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anthropological Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Anthropological Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anthropological Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anthropological Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthropological Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026