John Collier

1.7k citations
71 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

John Collier

66 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

John Collier
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 857
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 267
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 455
  • Surfaces, Coatings and Films 24
  • Ceramics and Composites 21
Replace Paul Mason with:
Paul Mason United Kingdom
Saumyabrata Banerjee United Kingdom
Koji Tsubakimoto Japan
M. Siebold Germany
Xinglong Xie China
B. Surma Poland
Xuewei Deng China
Qihua Zhu China
Mark J. Guardalben United States
K. Imasaki Japan
John Collier relative to Paul Mason United Kingdom Paul Mason's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Paul Mason · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Collier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Collier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Collier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Collier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Collier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Collier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Collier. The network helps show where John Collier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Collier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Collier Line = papers co-authored together John Collier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017148
2 2000121
3 201299
4 201074
5 200870
6 201667
7 201562
8 201159
9 201158
10 199953
11 201841
12 201034
13 201628
14 200922
15 201522
16 202021
17 200019
18 201419
19 201117
20 202116

About John Collier

John Collier is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Computational Mechanics and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Solid State Laser Technologies (47 papers), Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (18 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (9 papers), Laser Design and Applications (9 papers), Optical Systems and Laser Technology (4 papers), Photonic Crystal and Fiber Optics (3 papers), Pulsed Power Technology Applications (3 papers) and Laser Material Processing Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (857 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (267 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (455 citations), Surfaces, Coatings and Films (24 citations) and Ceramics and Composites (21 citations). John Collier has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Cristina Hernandez–Gomez, Klaus G. Ertel, Paul Mason, Saumyabrata Banerjee, Jonathan P. Phillips, Thomas Butcher, Mariastefania De Vido, Jodie Smith, Ian N. Ross and C. J. Hooker. Their work appears in journals such as Optics Express, Optics Letters, Applied Optics, High Power Laser Science and Engineering and Optical Materials Express.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact