Verslas teorija ir praktika

750 papers and 4.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 750 papers published in Verslas teorija ir praktika in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Verslas teorija ir praktika usually cover Economics and Econometrics (247 papers), Strategy and Management (233 papers) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (122 papers) specifically the topics of Socio-economic Development and Sustainability (71 papers), Economic and Business Development Strategies (60 papers) and Business and Economic Development (50 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Verslas teorija ir praktika are Romualdas Ginevičius, Valentinas Podvezko, Manuela Tvaronavičienė, Yuriy Bilan, Manish Gupta, Oleksandr Sylkin, Musarrat Shaheen, Juozas Bivainis, Valentinas Navickas and Myroslav Kryshtanovych.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Verslas teorija ir praktika

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Verslas teorija ir praktika. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Verslas teorija ir praktika.

Countries where authors publish in Verslas teorija ir praktika

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Verslas teorija ir praktika. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Verslas teorija ir praktika with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Verslas teorija ir praktika more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025