Frontiers of Mathematics in China

829 papers and 5.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 829 papers published in Frontiers of Mathematics in China in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Frontiers of Mathematics in China usually cover Mathematical Physics (233 papers), Geometry and Topology (229 papers) and Applied Mathematics (220 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Topics in Algebra (131 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (123 papers) and Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (81 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Frontiers of Mathematics in China are Wen‐Xiu Ma, Liqun Qi, Mu-Fa Chen, Yiju Wang, Shou-Ting Chen, Tomás Caraballo, Hermann Brunner, Tao Tang, Shanzhen Lu and Kening Lu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Frontiers of Mathematics in China

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Frontiers of Mathematics in China. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Frontiers of Mathematics in China.

Countries where authors publish in Frontiers of Mathematics in China

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Frontiers of Mathematics in China. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Frontiers of Mathematics in China with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frontiers of Mathematics in China more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025