The History of the Family

775 papers and 4.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 775 papers published in The History of the Family in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The History of the Family usually cover Sociology and Political Science (356 papers), Economics and Econometrics (304 papers) and History (245 papers) specifically the topics of Historical Economic and Social Studies (294 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (194 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (99 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The History of the Family are Mikołaj Szołtysek, Jan Kok, Sarah Carmichael, Michel Oris, Beatrice Moring, Karl Käser, Antoinette Fauve-Chamoux, Richard Wall, Glenn Sandström and Gunnar Thorvaldsen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The History of the Family

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The History of the Family. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The History of the Family.

Countries where authors publish in The History of the Family

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The History of the Family. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The History of the Family with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The History of the Family more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025