Foot and Ankle Clinics

1.3k papers and 22.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Foot and Ankle Clinics in the last decades have received a total of 22.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Foot and Ankle Clinics usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (1.1k papers), Surgery (597 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (410 papers) specifically the topics of Foot and Ankle Surgery (953 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (686 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (416 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Foot and Ankle Clinics are Mark S. Myerson, Nicola Maffulli, Beat Hintermann, V. James Sammarco, Steven M. Raikin, C. Niek van Dijk, C. Niek van Dijk, Eric M. Bluman, J. Chris Coetzee and M. O’Brien.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Foot and Ankle Clinics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Foot and Ankle Clinics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Foot and Ankle Clinics.

Countries where authors publish in Foot and Ankle Clinics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Foot and Ankle Clinics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Foot and Ankle Clinics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Foot and Ankle Clinics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025