World Journal of Orthopedics

20.6k citations
1.1k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Surgery top 5%
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
    • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
    • Hip and Femur Fractures
    • Hip disorders and treatments

Papers in

    • Foot and Ankle Surgery 83
    • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes 138
    • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty 136
    • Shoulder Injury and Treatment 93
    • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments 91
    • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation 70
    • Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques 67

World Journal of Orthopedics

901 papers receiving 19.3k citations

Peers

World Journal of Orthopedics
Comparison fields: 5 of 193
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 3.5k
  • Surgery 10.4k
  • Rehabilitation 929
  • Rheumatology 1.7k
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.6k
Replace Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine with:
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine United States
Journal of Orthopaedic Translation China
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery South Korea
EFORT Open Reviews United Kingdom
Current Osteoporosis Reports United States
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Italy
HSS Journal® The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery United States
Bone and Joint Research United Kingdom
Sports Health A Multidisciplinary Approach United States
Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review United States
World Journal of Orthopedics relative to Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine United States Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in World Journal of Orthopedics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in World Journal of Orthopedics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites World Journal of Orthopedics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics.

About World Journal of Orthopedics

The 1.1k papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics in the last decades have received a total of 20.6k indexed citations . Papers published in World Journal of Orthopedics usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (163 papers), Surgery (605 papers), Rehabilitation (52 papers), Rheumatology (88 papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (71 papers) specifically the topics of Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (138 papers), Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (136 papers), Shoulder Injury and Treatment (93 papers), Orthopedic Infections and Treatments (91 papers), Foot and Ankle Surgery (83 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (70 papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (67 papers) and Bone fractures and treatments (62 papers). The most active scholars publishing in World Journal of Orthopedics are Joaquín Moya-Angeler, Nebahat Sezer, Kemal Nas, Egemen Ayhan, Pedro Carpintero, Ashraf S. Gorgey, Pavel Kotlarsky, Thomas Mabey, Giuseppe Musumeci and Manit Arora.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact