Technical Services Quarterly

902 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 902 papers published in Technical Services Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Technical Services Quarterly usually cover Information Systems (509 papers), Library and Information Sciences (253 papers) and Conservation (120 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (310 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (213 papers) and Library Science and Information Systems (184 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technical Services Quarterly are Lisa Rose-Wiles, Lihong Zhu, Zheng Yang, A. B. Baker, Michael Rodríguez, Kathleen Wells, Sara Morris, Susan S. Smith, Fu Zhuo and Walter A. Brown.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Technical Services Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Technical Services Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technical Services Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Technical Services Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technical Services Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technical Services Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technical Services Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025