Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

5.0k citations
663 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 136
    • Library Science and Administration 42
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 123
    • Research Data Management Practices 123
    • Web and Library Services 117

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

469 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Library and Information Sciences 872
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 671
  • Information Systems and Management 630
  • Information Systems 2.0k
  • Computer Science Applications 369
Replace Science & Technology Libraries with:
Science & Technology Libraries United States
Information Services & Use United States
New Review of Academic Librarianship United Kingdom
Collection Management United States
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice United States
Library Collections Acquisitions and Technical Services United States
Insights the UKSG journal United Kingdom
Australian Academic & Research Libraries Australia
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology United States
Collection Building United States
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship relative to Science & Technology Libraries United States Science & Technology Libraries's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Science & Technology Libraries · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

About Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

The 663 papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship usually cover Library and Information Sciences (144 papers), Information Systems (322 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (66 papers), Information Systems and Management (62 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (36 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (136 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (123 papers), Research Data Management Practices (123 papers), Web and Library Services (117 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (66 papers), Library Science and Administration (42 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (40 papers) and Open Education and E-Learning (27 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship are Nestor Osorio, Beverly Ryan, Hannah Rempel, Steve Hiller, Ann Lazarsfeld-Jensen, Vincent F. Scalfani, Michael Fosmire, Jake Carlson, Julie Waters and Vincent H. Resh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact