Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

4.6k citations
639 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 135
    • Library Science and Administration 42
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 121
    • Research Data Management Practices 120
    • Web and Library Services 114

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

462 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship
Comparison fields: 5 of 201
  • Library and Information Sciences 833
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 637
  • Information Systems 1.9k
  • Information Systems and Management 581
  • History and Philosophy of Science 305
Replace Science & Technology Libraries with:
Science & Technology Libraries United States
Collection Management United States
New Review of Academic Librarianship United Kingdom
Information Services & Use United States
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice United States
Library Collections Acquisitions and Technical Services United States
Australian Academic & Research Libraries Australia
Collection Building United States
Library Resources and Technical Services United States
Insights the UKSG journal United Kingdom
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship relative to Science & Technology Libraries United States Science & Technology Libraries's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Science & Technology Libraries · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

About Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

The 639 papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship in the last decades have received a total of 4.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship usually cover Library and Information Sciences (143 papers), Information Systems (314 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (65 papers), Information Systems and Management (60 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (36 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (135 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (121 papers), Research Data Management Practices (120 papers), Web and Library Services (114 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (65 papers), Library Science and Administration (42 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (39 papers) and Data Quality and Management (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship are Nestor Osorio, Beverly Ryan, Hannah Rempel, Steve Hiller, Ann Lazarsfeld-Jensen, Vincent F. Scalfani, Michael Fosmire, Jake Carlson, Julie Waters and Vincent H. Resh.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact