Cataloging & Classification Quarterly

1.5k papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly usually cover Information Systems (1.1k papers), Conservation (251 papers) and Library and Information Sciences (224 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Systems (886 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (315 papers) and Digital and Traditional Archives Management (249 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly are Jung‐ran Park, Jane Greenberg, Barbara Β. Tillett, Richard P. Smiraglia, Hope A. Olson, William H. Mischo, Arlene G. Taylor, Philip Hider, Michael Gorman and Louise F. Spiteri.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cataloging & Classification Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cataloging & Classification Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025