Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

4.8k citations
898 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 313
    • Library Science and Administration 212
    • Web and Library Services 170
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 109
    • Research Data Management Practices 35

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

694 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Library and Information Sciences 1.6k
  • Information Systems 1.6k
  • Medical Terminology 15
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 335
  • Communication 285
Replace Medical Reference Services Quarterly with:
Medical Reference Services Quarterly United States
Library journal United States
Australian Academic & Research Libraries Australia
Collection Management United States
Science & Technology Libraries United States
Information Services & Use United States
Library Collections Acquisitions and Technical Services United States
Education for Information United Kingdom
The Reference Librarian United States
Reference & User Services Quarterly United States
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice relative to Medical Reference Services Quarterly United States Medical Reference Services Quarterly's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Medical Reference Services Quarterly · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence Based Library and Information Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice.

About Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

The 898 papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice in the last decades have received a total of 4.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice usually cover Library and Information Sciences (373 papers), Information Systems (332 papers), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (57 papers) and General Health Professions (177 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (313 papers), Library Science and Administration (212 papers), Web and Library Services (170 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (143 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (109 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (38 papers), Research Data Management Practices (35 papers) and Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice are Virginia S. Wilson, Karen Davies, Denise Koufogiannakis, Jessie McGowan, Margaret Sampson, Carol A. Lefebvre, Amy Jo Catalano, Jonathan D. Eldredge, Natasha Wiebe and Alison Brettle.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact