Public & Access Services Quarterly

585 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 585 papers published in Public & Access Services Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Public & Access Services Quarterly usually cover Library and Information Sciences (266 papers), Information Systems (258 papers) and Education (75 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (226 papers), Web and Library Services (199 papers) and Library Science and Administration (138 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public & Access Services Quarterly are Barbara Blummer, Sarah Johnson, Laura Saunders, Melissa S. Anderson, Mary Renck Jalongo, Paul Fehrmann, Mark Sanders, Tamara Townsend, R Eric Miller and Swapna Kumar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Public & Access Services Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public & Access Services Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public & Access Services Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Public & Access Services Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public & Access Services Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public & Access Services Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public & Access Services Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025