Science & Technology Libraries

5.0k citations
811 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy
    • Library Science and Administration
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
    • Web and Library Services
    • Research Data Management Practices
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 142
    • Library Science and Administration 43
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 150
    • Web and Library Services 121
    • Research Data Management Practices 87

Science & Technology Libraries

605 papers receiving 3.9k citations

Peers

Science & Technology Libraries
Comparison fields: 5 of 212
  • Library and Information Sciences 1.1k
  • Information Systems 2.1k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 628
  • Information Systems and Management 520
  • History and Philosophy of Science 326
Replace Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship with:
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship United States
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice United States
New Review of Academic Librarianship United Kingdom
Health Information & Libraries Journal United Kingdom
Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship United States
Australian Academic & Research Libraries Australia
Collection Building United States
Collection Management United States
Education for Information United Kingdom
Information Services & Use United States
Science & Technology Libraries relative to Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship United States Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Science & Technology Libraries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Science & Technology Libraries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Science & Technology Libraries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Science & Technology Libraries more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Science & Technology Libraries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Science & Technology Libraries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Science & Technology Libraries.

About Science & Technology Libraries

The 811 papers published in Science & Technology Libraries in the last decades have received a total of 5.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Science & Technology Libraries usually cover Library and Information Sciences (155 papers), Information Systems (342 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (79 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (42 papers) and Information Systems and Management (63 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (150 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (142 papers), Web and Library Services (121 papers), Research Data Management Practices (87 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (79 papers), Library Science and Administration (43 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (24 papers) and Various Chemistry Research Topics (24 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Science & Technology Libraries are Heidi Blackburn, Thomas E. Pinelli, Tony Stankus, Barbara P. Buttenfield, Cecelia Brown, Lisl Zach, Joseph R. Kraus, Robert Tomaszewski, Preeti Mulay and Kate Manuel.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact